Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;329:390 (14 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7462.390-a
A 64 year old patient was referred to the emergency department by an oncology nurse. He had metastatic bronchogenic carcinoma and was complaining of bilateral leg weakness of recent onset. The referral note mentioned the possibility of cord compression secondary to bone metastasis. The patient was seen first by the emergency department doctor, who documented the leg weakness and then forwarded the patient for an orthopaedic review. The orthopaedic team agreed with the diagnosis and arranged hospital admission for urgent magnetic resonance imaging. They also discussed the case over the telephone with me (the on-call physician) regarding palliative management.
Late that night, while reviewing another patient, I overheard one of the student nurses telling her colleague that she had checked the blood sugar levels of the patient admitted with spinal cord compression and that they were very high. Armed with this new information, I reviewed the case history again and this time diagnosed new onset diabetes, precipitated partly by the dexamethasone the patient was taking as a result of his cerebral metastasis. He was discharged after a couple of days.
Since then, I have always paid a little more attention to the discussions of paramedical staff.
Mohammad Imran Khan, consultant in gastroenterology
Wanganui Hospital, New Zealand
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+