BMJ  2004;329 (6 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7474.0-d

Avoid being misled by claims in robust studies

Although guides on identifying weak studies are widely available, clinicians also need to be able to detect when authors of methodologically strong clinical research reports make misleading claims. Montori and colleagues (p 1093) present six helpful pointers and indicate that several strategies for spotting biased reporting are available. They warn that misleading reporting will always be with us, and clinicians need to stay armed.

Related Article

Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports
Victor M Montori, Roman Jaeschke, Holger J Schünemann, Mohit Bhandari, Jan L Brozek, P J Devereaux, and Gordon H Guyatt
BMJ 2004 329: 1093-1096. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Online poll
Find out more

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.


Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview