BMJ  2006;332 (24 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7556.0

Treating carpal tunnel syndrome endoscopically may not be cost effective

In the treatment of employed patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, endoscopic surgery is associated with modestly less pain than open surgery up to three months after operation, but it does not get patients back to work any faster. Atroshi and colleagues (p 1473) randomised 128 employed patients aged 25-60 years with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome to either endoscopic or open carpal tunnel release surgery. Both methods were equally effective in relieving symptoms. The small benefit makes the cost effectiveness of endoscopic surgery uncertain, say the authors.


Figure 1
Credit: PHOTOS.COM

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Does continuing medical education work?
Christopher M Buttery
BMJ 2006 333: 99. [Extract] [Full Text]

Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trial
Isam Atroshi, Gert-Uno Larsson, Ewald Ornstein, Manfred Hofer, Ragnar Johnsson, and Jonas Ranstam
BMJ 2006 332: 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview