Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR
Talking to a physician vs writing alone
This article originally appeared in BMJ USA
EDITOR The Schilte study may help us learn when disclosure can be helpful or
harmful. It may also speak to recent controversies surrounding critical
incident stress debriefing (CISD), in which recently traumatized
individuals are pressed to talk about their emotions to people in a
group context. An increasing number of controlled tests of techniques
wherein people have been asked to talk about emotional upheavals to
others have found this form of debriefing to be either unhealthy or to
have no effect.3
Having to deal with deeply emotional topics in a social setting forces
the listener to help regulate what is and isn't said. The social
pressure of talking to an "expert" may invite embarrassment or
humiliation on the part of the patient. When people are writing (or
talking into a tape recorder) by themselves, they are able to determine
how much they are willing to disclose. In short, solitary disclosure
allows people to determine their own dose.
On its surface, the study by Schilte et al suggests that
disclosure of emotional events has no effect on markers of physical
health or health-related behaviors
a finding at odds with dozens of
published studies during the past few years.
1 2
A
critical difference between the study by Schilte et al and most other
disclosure studies is that Schilte et al required participants to talk
about a traumatic experience to another person. Most successful disclosure studies, on the other hand, have had participants write anonymously about a trauma for several days either in a laboratory, a
neutral setting, or at home.
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin,
USA pennebaker{at}psy.utexas.edu
| 1. | Smyth JM. Written emotional expression: effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. J Cons Clin Psychol 1998; 66: 174-184[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]. |
| 2. | Pennebaker JW, Graybeal A. Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Cur Dir in Psychol Sci 2001; 10: 90-93. |
| 3. |
Small R, Lumley J, Donohue L, Potter A, Waldenstrom U.
Randomised controlled trial of midwife led debriefing to reduce maternal depression after childbirth.
BMJ
2000;
321:
1043-1047 |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+