Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
This article originally appeared in BMJ USA
In January 2002, the US Preventive Services Task
Force (USPSTF) updated its recommendations on the use of aspirin for
the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
(http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/aspirin/asprr.htm). The
recommendations were based on a commissioned evidence review, published
in the Annals of Internal Medicine.1 That
review found good evidence that aspirin decreases the incidence of
coronary heart disease in high-risk adults, good evidence that aspirin increases the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, and fair evidence
that aspirin increases the incidence of hemorrhagic strokes. The USPSTF
gave an A recommendation to discussing these benefits and harms with
all adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: men older than
40 years, postmenopausal women, and younger people with risk factors
such as hypertension, diabetes, or smoking. The panel indicated that
the balance of benefits and harms from long-term aspirin use is most
favorable in high-risk groups (>3% risk of developing heart disease
within 5 years), but noted that the tradeoffs are subject to patient
preferences and that some people at lower risk may not find the balance
of benefits and harms acceptable. It referred clinicians to resources
to calculate 5-years risks in patients
(http://www.intmed.mcw.edu/clincalc/heartrisk.html). Doses of 75 mg per
day appear to be as effective as higher doses. The report said that
repeating discussions of aspirin therapy every 5 years was a
"reasonable option." Although older patients may derive greater
benefits because they are at higher risk for CHD and stroke, their risk
for bleeding may also be higher.
| 1. | US Preventive Services Task Force. Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: Summary of the Evidence. Ann Intern Med 2002; 1362: 161-172. |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+