BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.39534.571042.BE, (Published 24 April 2008)

Research

Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris

¹ Cardiac Directorate, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, ² Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London, ³ Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London, Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, ⁴ Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2AA

Objectives To determine whether coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris is underused in older patients, women, south Asian patients, and those from socioeconomically deprived areas, and, if it is, whether this is associated with higher coronary event rates.

Design Multicentre cohort with five year follow-up.

Setting Six ambulatory care clinics in England.

Participants 1375 consecutive patients in whom coronary angiography was individually rated as appropriate with the Rand consensus method.

Main outcome measures Receipt of angiography (420 procedures); coronary mortality and acute coronary syndrome events.

Results In a multivariable analysis, angiography was less likely to be performed in patients aged over 64 compared with those aged under 50 (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.96), women compared with men (0.42, 0.35 to 0.50), south Asians compared with white people (0.48, 0.34 to 0.67), and patients in the most deprived fifth compared with the other four fifths (0.66, 0.40 to 1.08). Not undergoing angiography when it was deemed appropriate was associated with higher rates of coronary event.

Conclusions At an early stage after presentation with suspected angina, coronary angiography is underused in older people, women, south Asians, and people from deprived areas. Not receiving appropriate angiography was associated with a higher risk of coronary events in all groups. Interventions based on clinical guidance that supports individualised management decisions might improve access and outcomes.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Universality, equity, and quality of care

Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2008 336: 1278-1281. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Does access to cardiac investigation and treatment contribute to social and ethnic differences in coronary heart disease? Whitehall II prospective cohort study

Annie Britton, Martin Shipley, Michael Marmot, and Harry Hemingway
BMJ 2004 329: 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Statistics Notes: Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates

Douglas G Altman and J Martin Bland
BMJ 2003 326: 219. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ethnic differences in invasive management of coronary disease: prospective cohort study of patients undergoing angiography

Gene Feder, Angela M Crook, Patrick Magee, Shrilla Banerjee, Adam D Timmis, and Harry Hemingway
BMJ 2002 324: 511-516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Delamothe, T. (2008). Universality, equity, and quality of care. BMJ 336: 1278-1281 [Full text]  
• (2008). Inequitable Access to Coronary Angiography Linked with Higher Rates of Coronary Events and Death. JWatch General 2008: 3-3 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Inequity in access to care in a deprived area in France

Frédéric Lapostolle, et al.
bmj.com, 19 May 2008 [Full text]