Longevity of screenwriters who win an academy award: longitudinal study
BMJ 2001; 323 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1491 (Published 22 December 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:1491
- Donald A Redelmeier (dar{at}ices.on.ca), clinician scientist,
- Sheldon M Singh, researcher
- Correspondence to: D A Redelmeier
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the link between high success and longevity extends to academy award winning screenwriters.
Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.
Participants: All screenwriters ever nominated for an academy award.
Main outcome measures: Life expectancy and all cause mortality.
Results: A total of 850 writers were nominated; the median duration of follow up from birth was 68 years; and 428 writers died. On average, winners were more successful than nominees, as indicated by a 14% longer career (27.7 v 24.2, P=0.004), 34% more total films (23.2 v 17.3, P<0.001), 58% more four star films (4.8 v 3.1, P<0.001), and 62% more nominations (2.1 v 1.3, P<0.001). However, life expectancy was 3.6 years shorter for winners than for nominees (74.1 v 77.7 years, P=0.004), equivalent to a 37% relative increase in death rates (95% confidence interval 10 to 70). After adjustment for year of birth, sex, and other factors, a 35% relative increase in death rates was found (7% to 70%). Additional wins were associated with a 22% relative increase in death rates (3% to 44%). Additional nominations and additional other films in a career otherwise caused no significant increase in death rates.
Conclusion: The link between occupational achievement and longevity is reversed in screenwriters who win academy awards. Doubt is cast on simple biological theories for the survival gradients found for other members of society.
What is already known on this topic
What is already known on this topic High achievement has been associated with decreased all cause mortality for people in many different occupations
Such an association is compatible with behavioural and biological theories for the role of social determinants
What this study adds
What this study adds Screenwriters nominated for an academy award show a paradoxical survival pattern, where greater success is associated with a large decrease in life expectancy
The paradox is not easily explained by talent, prestige, financial earnings, material conditions, reverse causality, measurement error, or simple demographics It might reflect the unusual lifestyles of writers, where success is not linked to exemplary conduct or control; this underscores the importance of behaviour
Footnotes
-
Editorial by Davey Smith
-
Funding DAR was supported by a career scientist award from the Ontario Ministry of Health and the de Souza Chair of the University of Toronto. SMS was supported by the Jane and Howard Jones Bursary of the University of Toronto. These funding sources had no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of this study.
-
Competing interests None declared.
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £173 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£38 / $45 / €42 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.