Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Antibiotic combinations have no advantage in febrile neutropenia
Patients with stable asthma may be able to take less inhaled corticosteroid
Test and treat is the best empirical strategy for treating dyspepsia
Iron supplements benefit non-anaemic women with fatigue
Verbal autopsies give higher suicide rates in rural India
Diabetic patients' records are missing the C10 Read code
Combinations of
lactam with an aminoglycoside have no advantage over
treatment with
lactam monotherapy for patients with fever and
neutropenia. Paul and colleagues (p
1111) carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47
studies, amounting to 7807 patients. Overall survival was no better with
combination therapy than with monotherapy, and adverse effects were more
common. Furthermore, broad spectrum monotherapy was a more successful
treatment. The authors conclude that broad spectrum monotherapy offers an
overall benefit.
Stepping down the dose of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic stable asthma can reduce the amount taken without compromising asthma control. Hawkins and colleagues (p 1115) conducted a one year, randomised, controlled, double blind trial among 259 primary care patients with asthma in western and central Scotland. The participants were randomised to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids which either remained unchanged or were reduced by 50% by stepping down the dose. The groups had similar rates of asthma exacerbation and similar numbers of visits to general practice or hospital, as well as similar disease specific and generic measures of health status.
|
A "test for Helicobacter pylori and treat" strategy is more effective than treatment with a proton pump inhibitor for managing dyspepsia in young patients. In a randomised controlled trial in patients aged under 45 with uninvestigated symptoms of dyspepsia, Manes and colleagues (p 1118) compared empirical treatment with omeprazole with test and treat (urea breath test for H pylori followed by eradication treatment if necessary or by omeprazole alone). With the test and treat strategy, symptoms resolved in many patients and the need for endoscopy was reduced, whereas symptoms usually recurred after a trial of omeprazole. The authors conclude that test and treat should be the preferred option if empirical treatment of dyspepsia is to be performed.
|
Women with fatigue who are not anaemic may benefit from iron supplementation. Verdon and colleagues (p 1124) conducted a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial in nine primary care sites and among 144 women in western Switzerland. Fatigue after one month decreased by 30% in women taking iron, and by 13% in the placebo group. Subgroup analysis showed that the effect may be restricted to women with low or borderline serum ferritin concentrations.
|
Verbal autopsiesassessments of the cause of death without physical examinationfind suicide rates are double or triple those found using other methods. Joseph and colleagues (p 1121) used data from verbal autopsies taken during 1994-9 in a community health programme in rural southern India. Older men were more likely to commit suicide than younger men, and most women who committed suicide were aged 15-24 or over 65. Verbal autopsies can give a good idea of suicide rates, which are notoriously difficult to calculate accurately in developing countries because of census problems and because families are often reluctant to reveal the cause of death in cases of suicide.
General practices need to use a wide range of codes to identify people with diabetes, as not all diabetic patients have the C10 Read code recorded in their computerised medical records. Gray and colleagues (p 1130) found that in one primary care group in south London only 63% of patients known to have diabetes were identified through the C10 Read code for diabetes.
|
The rest were identified through prescription records and other diabetes related codes. The authors say that the use of Read codes for diabetes needs to be standardised and coding levels improved if valid diabetes registers are to be constructed and the quality of care monitored effectively.
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+