Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I am astonished that six months have gone by without any response to the article by Black et al [1] being published. The paper makes some challenging assertions. The authors state that previous studies have been of poor quality yet themselves report data from patients on the basis of symptoms alone. It is well established that urinary symptoms alone are of little value in reaching a diagnosis of either genuine stress incontinence (GSI) or detrusor instability (DI) [2]. Thus the patients included will contain a mixture of those with GSI, DI and other conditons and since roughly 65% of patients have GS the proportion of patients in the improved or not improved groups may well be different. The resulting bias will distort the results of both surgery and of the study, and therefore perhaps mask the risks of surgery in patients with DI.
The authors continue by stating on the basis of this data that urgency is not a contraindication to surgery, and conclude by questioning the value of cystometry. We would argue strongly against these two assertions based upon data from such a poorly defined study, particularly where the authors show themselves to be unfamiliar with the difficulties of reaching diagnoses in these patients. We agree that the symptoms of urgency and urge incontinence are not contraindications to surgery since many patients with GSI will complain of these. However, a diagnosis of DI is certainly a relative contraindication to surgery [3] and, as previously stated, this cannot be diagnosed on history alone [2]. Cystometry will exclude instability in addition to providing important information on voiding flow rates and pressures, which is importance when trying to minimise postoperative retention. The benefit of reaching a proper diagnosis and of identifying potential voiding disturbances mean that preoperative cystometry is and should remain an essential investigation in the management of women with urinary complaints.
1. Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C, Bowling A, Abel P. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study. Br Med J 1997;315:1493-1498.
2. Sand PK, Hill RC, Ostergard DR. Incontinence history as a predictor of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:257-259.
3. Cardozo LD, Stanton SL. Genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability: a review of 200 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:184-190.
Douglas Tincello
Competing interests:
No competing interests
02 May 1998
Douglas G Tincello
Specialist Registrar (Year 4)
Urodynamic Department, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS
Diagnosis should precede treatment
The authors continue by stating on the basis of this data that urgency is not a contraindication to surgery, and conclude by questioning the value of cystometry. We would argue strongly against these two assertions based upon data from such a poorly defined study, particularly where the authors show themselves to be unfamiliar with the difficulties of reaching diagnoses in these patients. We agree that the symptoms of urgency and urge incontinence are not contraindications to surgery since many patients with GSI will complain of these. However, a diagnosis of DI is certainly a relative contraindication to surgery [3] and, as previously stated, this cannot be diagnosed on history alone [2]. Cystometry will exclude instability in addition to providing important information on voiding flow rates and pressures, which is importance when trying to minimise postoperative retention. The benefit of reaching a proper diagnosis and of identifying potential voiding disturbances mean that preoperative cystometry is and should remain an essential investigation in the management of women with urinary complaints.
1. Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C, Bowling A, Abel P. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study. Br Med J 1997;315:1493-1498.
2. Sand PK, Hill RC, Ostergard DR. Incontinence history as a predictor of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:257-259.
3. Cardozo LD, Stanton SL. Genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability: a review of 200 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:184-190.
Douglas Tincello
Competing interests: No competing interests