Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Bureaucracy of ethics...
  2. Bureaucracy of ethics applications
Education And Debate

Bureaucracy of ethics applications

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7460.282 (Published 29 July 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:282

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Practical Challenges for Commercial Enterprises in the Ethics Review Process for Digital Health Research: Document Analysis and Interview Study
  • In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
  • Paper use in research ethics applications and study conduct
  • Ethics, governance and consent in the UK: implications for research into the longer-term outcomes of congenital heart defects
  • The ethics of ethical research committees: Clinical psychology trainees experiences of seeking ethical approval for their research
  • Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
  • Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5
  • How to approach a research ethics committee
  • Towards sustainable clinical trials
  • Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial
  • The shifting sands of research ethics and governance: effect on research in paediatrics
  • Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?
  • Beware the problems of centralisation. Commentary on... Mental health research system in England
  • Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: add 150 days to your study protocol
  • Ethics review of research and audit
  • Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: Ask for help
  • Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: Good governance is needed
  • Better support for investigators is essential
  • Clinical research under the cosh again
Back to top