Editorials Screening research papers by reading abstracts BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7464.470 (Published 26 August 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:470 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Just how rapid is “eternal” review? Published: 30 September 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.801-c Letter Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Review may be eternal but rejection is swift Published: 30 September 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.801-d Letter Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Idea seems reasonable Published: 30 September 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7469.801-b See more Doctors in Pakistan call for workers deported from the UAE to be screened for HIV BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6544; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6544 Time for guidelines on safety netting? BMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6411; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6411 The BMJ Christmas appeal 2016-7: Orbis, the sight savers BMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6425; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6425 Association between screening and the thyroid cancer “epidemic” in South Korea: evidence from a nationwide study BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i5745; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5745 Overdiagnosis of thyroid cancer BMJ November 30, 2016, 355 i6312; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6312 Cited by... Evaluation of spin in abstracts of papers in psychiatry and psychology journalsAbstract Fulltext PDF The abstract: A 'three-star opportunityAbstract Fulltext PDF Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Idea seems reasonableAbstract Fulltext PDF Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Review may be eternal but rejection is swiftAbstract Fulltext PDF Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Just how rapid is "eternal" review?Abstract Fulltext PDF