Rise in “no indicated risk” primary caesareans in the United States, 1991-2001: cross sectional analysis
BMJ 2005; 330 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38279.705336.0B (Published 06 January 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:71Data supplement
Medical risk factors
Anaemia, cardiac disease, acute or chronic lung disease, diabetes, genital herpes, hydramnios/oligohydramnios, haemoglobinopathy, chronic hypertension, pregnancy associated hypertension, eclampsia, incompetent cervix, previous infant ³ 4000 g, previous preterm or small for gestational age infant, renal disease, Rh sensitisation, uterine bleeding.
Complications of labour or delivery
Febrile, meconium moderate/heavy, premature rupture of membrane, abruptio placenta, placenta previa, other excessive bleeding, seizures during labour, precipitous labour, prolonged labour, dysfunctional labour, breech/malpresentation, cephalopelvic disproportion, cord prolapse, anaesthetic complication, fetal distress.
Table: Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for primary caesarean delivery for mothers with no indicated risk factors†: United States, 1991, 1996, and 2001All mothers
First time mothers
Year
2001
1.49** (1.47 to 1.50)
1.46** (1.44 to 1.48)
1996
0.99 (0.98 to 1.00)
0.99 (0.97 to 1.00)
1991
1.00
1.00
Race/ethnicity
White non-Hispanic
1.00
1.00
Hispanic
1.54** (1.52 to 1.55)
1.65** (1.63 to 1.68)
Black non-Hispanic
1.79** (1.76 to 1.81)
1.80** (1.77 to 1.84)
Native American
0.98 (0.92 to 1.03)
1.08* (1.00 to 1.17)
Asian or Pacific Islander
1.12** (1.10 to1.14)
1.10** (1.07 to 1.13)
Age
20-24
1.00
1.00
25-29
1.47** (1.45 to 1.49)
1.65** (1.62 to 1.67)
30-34
1.91** (1.88 to 1.93)
2.30** (2.26 to 2.34)
35-39
2.62** (2.58 to 2.66)
3.58** (3.49 to 3.66)
³40
3.85** (3.74 to 3.96)
5.42** (5.16 to 5.70)
Education (years)
<12 years
1.00
1.00
12 years
1.22** (1.21 to 1.24)
1.21** (1.19 to 1.23)
³13 years
1.15** (1.14 to 1.17)
1.08** (1.06 to 1.10)
Birth weight (g)
<2500
1.63** (1.59 to 1.67)
1.40** (1.36 to 1.45)
2500-3999
1.00
1.00
³4000
2.23** (2.21 to 2.26)
2.76** (2.72 to 2.81)
Parity
1
1.00
–
³2
0.27** (0.27 to 0.28)
–
Source: Natality Data Sets: 1991, 1996, 2001. National Center for Health Statistics.
†Full term, singleton, vertex births with no medical risk factors or complications of labour or delivery reportedon the birth certificate.
*P<0.05.
**P<0.0001.
Related articles
- Letter Published: 31 March 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7494.790-a
See more
- Introductory AddressProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1
- Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond'sProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10
- Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical ProfessionProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13
- An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive LetterpressProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4
- A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &cProv Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a
Cited by...
- Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis
- Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study
- Non-urgent caesarean delivery increases the need for ventilation at birth in term newborn infants
- Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term
- How to prevent caesarean deliveries deserves more study